That said, there are certain instances of strict liability in tort that cannot be entirely understood as reflecting a defendant’s moral responsibility for rights infringement, whether fault-based or non-fault-based. The property torts,293 in particular, resist explanation along these lines. These torts are famously prepared to impose strict liability on a defendant who unforeseeably causes harm, such as by crossing land294 or converting a chattel that he could not reasonably have predicted might belong to anyone other than him.295 To be sure, it is possible to culpably commit trespass or convert a chattel. Similarly it is possible, as Vincent shows, to commit a property tort in a manner that imposes a substantial and nonreciprocal risk of infringing another person’s rights against property damage.296 In large part, therefore, the property torts can be seen as identifying and enforcing remedial liabilities resting on both fault-based and non-fault-based forms of moral responsibility for rights infringement. As the case of the unforeseeable and innocent trespass shows, however, that is not all they do.
Российский врач вернется к работе после истекшей кровью пациентки14:48。业内人士推荐新收录的资料作为进阶阅读
（一）船舶所有人的受雇人或者代理人；，更多细节参见新收录的资料
Фото: Влад Некрасов / Коммерсантъ，详情可参考新收录的资料